y
60.262im world häkeläishoo late, whokhow much
(of this cannot be
have & be paid to gain the arranged,
-
we
Ma
it
(här. 5))
then consider the question of affecting letter on 14,194 legislation, and then alene e) undently the W.0. would not consent to paying this necessary compensation in that case /
But as regar Beta
do the three conditions
quoted in incloure
seems superfluous in view of
Spinin in 16457
(a)
3 of the d. 0.
(b) is all
to require
the word "no
"
(C) seems
16457 but right,
befive word "compensation" in last time tutore (cf. abovequoted footnote from the tracing
2
on desp
cr
16104) IEnquired
ant to this being a clife of the X copyist at
as
C
the W.D. but I was told that they thought not; but my informant (Col. Llyd) was careful to explain that the compensation would be payable by the Col. JW!", the War Dept!
? In writing to for, say
not.
that apparently
no compensation " should be inserted
in the clause in questim,
2 was
gathers from 4972
the restricted leases
Lord Kanshend
the case im thin
Su8
4 to inform W... returning & Jan 89
the tracing
Department
Place anna all. The fruiras caresponderent paper
an these shipobre clauses the production of W0.s of th Jamz Foll¬
Mr. Beramuster 9.80
do
میدم
X
norther Wee below)
sur
There clauses are not deteceded to be drawn up
merely
any final form, but are suggestions (for conditions to be inserte leases) made by the G.O.C., and the copig
in
annexed hereto
Copied from a copy of the original letter) which
was shown ✡ me at tim
W.O., Lachicade but whether the first I cannot Say.
copy
wan
correct or
not
We have not received a copy of ite restrictive clauses actually inserted
4977/18 in certain leases, referred to in
Juggfan 321
Draft al m
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.